Forums/Z31P/z31-performance-upgrade-forums engine-mechanical-aa/NA Build
Imported from Z31Performance.com Forums{{#if:RobP3ZXT| — original post by RobP3ZXT}}{{#if:2007-12-13 09:36:43|, posted 2007-12-13 09:36:43}}{{#if:40| · 40 post{{#ifeq:40|1||s}}}}{{#if:/Z31performance_archive/forum/z31-performance-upgrade-forums/engine-mechanical-aa/3798-na-build.html|
Local archive: view archived thread on dev.z31library.com}}
RobP3ZXT: (2007-12-13 09:36:43)
I've looked around, and havn't seen any real good results, so I am wondering, has anyone ever built an NA for power? and I don't mean intake exhaust blah blah, but I mean upping the compression, real headwork tuning, bottle fed perhaps, has anyone acually done an NA VG?
all I ever see is people trying to pull power out of the 9.1, and frankly stock comp is just way too low to acually make power out of NA, unless someone has pulled it off.
anyways, your thoughts?
OrionMCP: (2007-12-13 14:18:25)
I know you dont want to hear it but your wasting your time. What kind of power are you looking to make? slap a turbo on your n/a motor and have some fun. You will have a little more power than a stock turbo with the higher compression and all. If your dead set on staying n/a talk to or-zman, hes done alot with his n/a if I remember correctly.
theres always nitrous too [archived image: smile.png]
RobP3ZXT: (2007-12-13 18:36:36)
I'm actually past stock turbo on my own build, this is purely Q&A
nutsaq: (2007-12-13 19:48:43)
you can just go buy one
http://www.hekimianracing.com/nissan3lna.html
Don't see the price anymore but I think it was around $5000
not bad for having all the work already done [archived image: wink.png]
devitor: (2007-12-13 22:28:46)
actually i just checked with that company and its....
get ready for this one guys....
you ready?
its a whopping $13000 for that motor!!!!
but still, thats a fully built race motor so i guess thats a decent price
SATAN: (2007-12-14 00:51:34)
Russ is building a badass NA. Chime in Russ, I dont wanna steal your spotlight.
OrionMCP: (2007-12-14 02:24:24)
Shit Rob, Im sorry I want paying attention to who was posting that, excuse my brain fart there. too many drugs [archived image: frown.png]
RobP3ZXT: (2007-12-14 04:25:40)
sall good, I wouldn't have it any other way than boosted.
but my curiosity is still valid, I've never really seen a high comp well done Z31 NA build. I dont think I've ever seen an NA dyno over 220whp.
bleakdragonmage: (2007-12-14 08:41:12)
haha…yea right…uhhh
NO!!!!!!!!!
sorry…13k is not a good price for a 300hp motor…i mean…chevy charges 13k for their 572 big block and that thing puts out over 700…
Kennedy: (2007-12-14 08:57:27)
300hp/3l 6cyl - 100hp/l - 16,67hp/cyl
695hp/572cid/9.4l 8cyl - 73.93hp/l - 9,24hp/cyl
OK85ZX: (2007-12-14 14:07:53)
I say anyone who posts a thread inquiring about making NA VG30 power should get a 2 week board ban.... that's just my opinion though.
- banni
Shady195: (2007-12-14 15:40:46)
wow $13000 for that motor, it better suck me and fuck me for that price.
2+2turbo: (2007-12-15 00:26:00)
for 13k you can build an entirely badd-ass turbo car .... THE ENTIRE CAR!!!
RobP3ZXT: (2007-12-15 03:51:32)
my point is, has a high comp build been done? I dont see it answered elsewhere, so I made a topic, if it gets answered, rather than spammed, it could easily be a flagship for the many many times people ask about natural aspiration.
anyways, I've got it too bad, if I get banned you'll just get a bunch of hits from the local library…
benz-tech: (2007-12-15 04:10:19)
there is a guy with an orange 510 that was featured in grassroots motorsport magazine. it had a 3.3L with custom 10.5/1 pistons, rebello vg33 headwork, nissan comp stage 2 cam and a pathy intake. 305hp at the flywheel at 6400rpm. he is accomplishing this with-i think- a less than ideal camshaft and intake, but thats just my opinion. i would rather rev a 3.0 higher to accomplish similar albiet slightly lower hp figures. i e-mailed him and got a lot of info from him. he was very helpful. i'm just too broke right now to do my own engine. I'm hoping for 250hp at the wheels from my imaginary 3.0 na engine. i'll get around to it one of these days. na all the way.
david2327: (2007-12-15 04:20:35)
I think that it's a very good question that I would also like an answer to. Everyone knows that it's easier and cheaper to make power with a turbo but this question has been asked alot and I think it deserves an answer. Unfortunatly I don't have the answer but I'm sure you would have to do the same things it takes to make na power on any engine. No one here is asking how expensive it is… only what to do to get it done. It bugs me when people reply to a post without a positive and helpful answer. I really hope that when I decide to come to this forum for valuable information I get answers that really help instead of sarcastic comments from people who don't know the answer. I really hope that someone provides a good answer for this question.
Russ84na: (2007-12-15 05:51:52)
As has been mentioned before I have been trying to get to 200+ whp for several years.
The pistons came in this week for my new build.
[attachment=0:3c6ae]Z31 custom Ross pistons 019 (Small).jpg[/attachment:3c6ae]
They will give me a 12:1 compression ratio. Hope to have it on the dyno by February and have some numbers to post.
SATAN: (2007-12-15 06:24:26)
Oh, boy.
When running NA you cannot move as much air in a given amount of time as a turbo car due to the lack of pressure(or I should say "volume"). What can you do to move more air then? You need higher RPM's. You can move more air but you just need more strokes to do it. This means higher redline. This is a problem on the VG30. anything above 7k and you are looking at bad stuff happening to the rods if it is that high for an extended amount of time. You need rods and good rods. Eagle rods recomends not going higher than 8500rpm's. Thats not good enough. I am looking for 10k rpms on my 3.3liter. So.... good rods. Maybe you dont want to go 3.3 liter due to the fact that you are adding weight to the piston by adding diameter. No good for revs.
Now displacement, Take your 3.3 liter and take it out as far as you can. They say you cant go further than 3.4 liters, but guess what… Thats for turbo. Face it, you just flat out wont be making the power of a built turbo, BUT this allows you more bore I would assume. The walls do not have to hold as much pressure. How far can you take it? Got me, try it and find out.
Now, you could stroke the engine to gain displacement, but that is not helping your 10k rev limit AT ALL! To much piston speed, and now you gotta bring your RPM's back down. Its give and take. An engine is always give and take. Maybe even DE-stroke the engine a little. Some of the badass z32 race cars ran a vg30 de-stroked to a 2.6 liter I believe (somebody may know for sure) to get a higher red line.
Compression ratio's. Now 9:1 aint doing shit for your NA power. You wanna bump that up to about 12:1 maybe even 13:1. Yeah, you gotta run race gas all the time now. Meh whatever. EDIT> (funny, Russ just posted he is running 12:1 as I was typing this LOL)
Combustion chamber shaping. Hmmm, yeah, study up on that before you go making what you have worse than what you started with.
Cam shaft profiles and gears. If you are running a really high RPM motor you are going to want good over lap for scavenging of exhaust gasses. You dont always want to run a high lift. The faster it ramps up, the more of a chance you get for valve float. Do research on cam shafts. SOHC, well… you can only shift your power band now cant you. Well since this is a high revving engine, you are probably going to be staying above 5k for the majority of your racing. Guess you better shift your power band to the higher side then.
Roller/solid lifter. Roller lifters obviously have less friction and allow you to run a more aggressive cam profile. Solid lifters, no spongy crap for this engine. Time to manually get your lash correct!
Light weight everything. Anything that moves in the engine bay can help if it is lighter weight EXCEPT THE HARMONIC BALANCER. If you go light on that, it should still be a harmonic damper and NOT just a lightweight pully! Lightweight parts, A- not as much rotational inertia and B- Lighter weight parts are easier to keep in check. Lighter valves dont float as easily. Lighter flywheels rob less power and help the engine rev faster. Stuff like that.
Retain your heat. Heat = power. Keep the heat where it is making the power. If your heat is leaving the cylinder through the walls or through the head or through the piston, then it is not being used to make power. Coatings help keep heat where it should be. Coat top of pistons, coat cylinder head combustion chambers, valves… anything you can think of, hell even the intake manifold. Keep heat where it should be and cool air where it should be also.
Tuning your exhaust and intake. This itself could be a whole damn book. Cam profiles come into play, runner lengths, pipe diameters, pipe tapers, pipe lengths. Lots of reading can be done on this, I'm not going into it here.
Porting and polishing? No shit, this can actually help? The hell you say? Make EVERYTHING as smooth as you can on a direct port fuel injected system. Keep ALL of your transitions as smooth as possible. If you have to have a step, make sure flow steps OUT and not IN. You can have it taper in but not step in.
Valve jobs. 3 or 5 angle, yeah just more stuff to help flow.
Moly coatings. You can coat friction surfaces like your bearings and your piston skirts to reduce the friction. Obviously, that will help.
Balancing and knife edging crank shafts, balancing, polishing rods and crank shaft. Knife edge cuts through the oil better than smacking it like a open hand on a water bed mattress. This also keeps oil from frothing. If your crank shaft is polished, oil has a harder time sticking to it, same with the rods. You can run crank scrapers to keep the oil down in the pan where it belongs. Balancing, well… your engine should be properly balanced regardless of the performance you are trying to get.
Shifting tolerances. You can shift all of your bearing tolerances to the looser side of things. This is not good for longevity but is good to reduce friction and free up maybe .00000001 hp.
Blow by = bad. Where do you think the majority of your blow by comes from? Most people would say the gap in the rings. Well this can be true depending on how big the gap is. What if you ran some total seal gap-less rings? Hey, leakdown of less that 1% sounds fricken awsome to me! But wait, with gap-less rings should seal perfect right? NO, your cylinder is never perfectly round. The rings cant conform to the cylinder perfectly. This is where lots of blow by can come into play. In many cases this is more of a problem then ring gap! I have actually herd (Or I dreamed this up) of pistons that have holes in the top of the piston that lead to the area right behind the ring, MEANING, as your piston compresses, it send pressure to the back side of those rings FORCING them tighter against the cylinder wall, Forcing them to conform to the cylinder wall more, thus reducing blow by even more.
Nitrous? Pffft. That is blasphemy when talking NA. But getting your fuel and timing PERFECT (which can take months, even years with some perfectionists) can benifit you quite a bit when trying to make power with ANY application, turbo OR N/A.
Meh, I grow weary of this. Too much effort for not enough power, I dont even run N/A why am I even typing this shit out? Oh, that right, because you guys asked.
There is plenty more that you can do, this should get you started, OH and dont forget to post your results in a few years when you finally get that super engine built! :twisted:
chronic: (2007-12-15 07:11:27)
satan you're so groovey
SATAN: (2007-12-15 07:39:12)
Notice I didn't mention money at all in that post. At least I dont think I did.
XiOus271: (2007-12-15 07:53:45)
satan, that was a really good read on NA power! i do a good bit of reading for NA power (albeit for my MR2) but thats probably some of the best information ive read compared to ive come across so far.
david2327: (2007-12-15 16:20:51)
Maybe Satan's response should be in a sticky so that people can read that before asking again. I think maybe that will help anyone out who is looking to build up an NA engine. And thanks again for not bringing up the money side of things and hopefully no one will ask the question of how much all that will cost because I'm scared to even think of those kind of numbers. Thanks again Satan.
Russ84na: (2007-12-15 18:41:09)
I never hear anyone say just how much they spent on their turbo conversions. It can't be that cheap when you add in all the parts cars and new turbos, intercoolers etc.
When I get done I will give you a cost breakdown on everything I do.
Both of my cars are putting out almost as much power as a stock turbo and will take almost any Z 240 to 350 turbo or NA that comes to an autoX event.
So if the argument is can you get more power out of turbo for less, you have to spell out how much power and what you want to use it for.
SATAN: (2007-12-15 20:00:43)
Here is the deal with building NA vs Turbo. With a turbo system it is EASY to get good results. Mainly because the system is not as picky when it comes to flaws as an N/A motor. You can slap a piss poor manifold on that doesent even seal all the way. You can put a poor flowing intake system on the car. Lots of things can be done VERY half assed on a turbo application and the user will still see positive horsepower gains as long as boost is built.
Building an NA engine is more of an art. Little mistakes can hurt you WAY more than they would with a turbo car. If you have steps in your intake pipes, a turbo engine doesnt really care as long as it is getting its pressure. Things like that. NA applications need to be much more precise than turbo. If the results are not what you want with turbo all you have to do is cram more air and fuel down its throat and it will make more power. This is not the case with NA because you CANT CRAM AIR. It has to be sucked in which requires efficiency of an engine system.
Russ84na: (2007-12-15 20:08:05)
I guess the woodworker in me finds more satisfaction in doing the job right.
So basically what you are saying is that building a 300whp NA requires the same dollars and attention to detail as building a 700whp turbo.
SATAN: (2007-12-15 21:48:03)
[quote]Russ84na wrote:
Building an NA engine is more of an art.
I guess the woodworker in me finds more satisfaction in doing the job right.
So basically what you are saying is that building a 300whp NA requires the same dollars and attention to detail as building a 700whp turbo.
Nope, I would say building a 300whp VG30E requires MORE attention to detail than building a 700whp VG30ET. As far as cost, hmmm could be close. You dont have the $1000 for a turbo that you can put elsewhere.
Russ84na: (2007-12-15 22:41:03)
[quote]SATAN wrote: [quote=Russ84na]
Building an NA engine is more of an art.
I guess the woodworker in me finds more satisfaction in doing the job right.
So basically what you are saying is that building a 300whp NA requires the same dollars and attention to detail as building a 700whp turbo.
Nope, I would say building a 300whp VG30E requires MORE attention to detail than building a 700whp VG30ET. As far as cost, hmmm could be close. You dont have the $1000 for a turbo that you can put elsewhere.
I might, but I think I will need it for that extra 10 HP.
phxZ31: (2007-12-16 08:16:59)
I've been slowly building my NA up. I too hope to get past 200whp sometime. If I can't do it with the stock bottom, I'm gonna be looking at raising the compression with new pistons much like Russ is doing. I'm probably a year behind Russ though in terms of getting to the point where all thats left to do is a new bottom end. I still have many other important mods to get done before the compression becomes the limiting factor.
Ptowns: (2008-07-14 12:47:56)
Vg34e anybody? Or is this NA build limited to 3.0L I think as far as money, the vg33e bored out to fit q45 pistons, with some good cams, headers, intake, and a good tune would be my path to NA power. I want to do what I have just listed and drop it in a m30 with a 5spd. Just been having a hard time finding a cheap vg33e.
92PathSE: (2008-07-14 14:14:25)
I was really hoping to make over 200 whp on my NA, but after reading this thread maybe not. My VG30 spare(pathfinder) has about 15k miles on it so I don't want to replace anything in the bottom. I was just going to port the heads, change cams, and use a larger TB from a 240SX sohc or change out the whole manifold to one from a VG33, if that's possible. Megasquirt for fuel and spark. I'd be really happy with 150 on the pavement but I don't see it happening now.
There's no room for a turbo and IC where they won't get damaged by rocks and stuff. Plus there would be miles of pipe.
Thanks for the info :-D
Russ84na: (2008-07-14 16:21:55)
150 on the pavement is a piece of cake. 130 is stock. I made 150 with headers, 2 1/2" custom exhaust, K&N filter (got rid of the intake box and resonater), 60mm throttle body, a way to add fuel(suggest Nistune), advancing the timing and a good tune up.
Got to 164 and 170 in two different cars with this set up and adjustable cam gears.
I ported/polished the heads and added nismo cams, and 260cc injectors looking for 200.
Unfortunately, the # 5 rod bearing gave out last summer (had 206K on it ) so I am starting over.
The bottom end is done, but the heads I had hoped to swap over were ruined also.
The new bottom end has The 12:1 CR Ross pistons. Once the new heads are done, I have no doubt that this time I will surpass 200 WHP. Hopefully that will be this summer before the race season is over.
a22770: (2008-07-25 06:25:11)
I currently have 211whp 209torque from a .040 over vg33. 11.4 comp, ferrea 1mm over valves, Isky .465 lift 270 dur. cam, ported heads, custom headers. This with the stock ecu map. Installing megasquirt now. Also has 60mm tb. Will be installing cam gears and coating the intake to help control heat that is absorbed from the coolant passage in the intake. With addl. mods hope to have 240 whp. But like my boss says, hope in one hand and shit in the other, then see which one fills up first.
Russ84na: (2008-07-25 22:59:55)
What are you using for Psitons to get 11.4 C/R?
88sinZ: (2008-07-25 23:08:05)
damn aaron you were using a stock map on that VG33? im suprised it even ran
my bets are you break 250hp+trq with a tune
a22770: (2008-07-26 04:20:37)
Using JE slugs, .04" dome, I think there are some pics somewhere.http://s252.photobucket.com/a … 31/a22770/
This piston with stock chambers has 12.3/1 compression. had to modify the chambers to correct a flow problem it had at .425 and higher lift.
HP numbers are with pump gas, may try 100 octane no-lead to see if it does any better
SATAN: (2008-07-26 14:47:16)
Ok, question, I don't know shit about shaping combustion chambers. I mean I can look at it and make a good guess as to where to add and remove materials, but in the end thats all it would be is a guess. So where did you learn exactly how to modify the combustion chambers? Do you have pictures of what you did? Also, you said it was at .425 lift and higher that flow seemed to have problems correct? How much improvement did you see?
a22770: (2008-07-28 05:05:51)
Most of what I have learned about shaping combustion chambers if from trial and error, and testing each change on the flowbench. The most important part is the evaluation if each change you make, and if you don't have a flowbench that can be very hard. The changes I make are purely from a flow stand point. I'm usually trying to improve a part of the flow curve or fix a problem. On the VG heads it was both. The later VG heads ( 85e and 0w0 castings ) have a smaller intake port than the older ( v52 and 21v ) castings. With the smaller port the velocity goes up, and at appx. .425 lift the air speed was too fast and the port stalled. A stall is where the port flows less at a higher valve lift, due to air separating from the short turn. Long story short the fix was not in the port, it was caused by the slight chamber shrouding of the intake valve.
The flow at .425 was 186cfm @ 28"h2o, and it dropped to 174 cfm by .440. After the changes to the chamber it flowed 199 cfm at .440 and would continue to flow until .500 where it flowed 214 cfm.
[archived image: DSCN1617.jpg]
Hope this helps.
92PathSE: (2008-07-29 03:17:04)
It helps, but I don't have access to a flowbench :-D Now I know what that 85 on the back of the head is for…
The stock hp for the 90-95 Pathfinders is 155hp, according to Nissan. Assuming they have the new-style heads, do they also have different cams or computers?
A whole new exhaust is a necessity. The old stuff is falling apart, cat is clogged, studs are broken… I have no idea what to expect as far as gains from fixing this. But I do know, it's gonna be a good day.
Despite all of the issues, the 92 gets better gas mileage than the 01…
Gusisboosted: (2018-11-02 04:27:42)
Going for a 220 WHP build on my 88k miles 1986 NA.
loving these VG30s so far!
GodofRichy: (2018-12-04 23:32:38)
Mike P did 225whp on his VG30e build. Itâs on the Z31 Drivers, Z31Online, and Z31Perfomance pages on Facebook. If Iâm not mistaken he used 280/280 isky cams with a pathfinder plenum in stock injectors. Has the dyno graph to prove it too.