Jump to content

Forums/Z31P/z31-performance-upgrade-forums engine-management/Radium FSTR returnless swirl tank on RB opinions?

From Z31 Library
Revision as of 05:10, 15 May 2026 by z31p_G-E (talk | contribs) (Forum archive import (z31performance))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Imported from Z31Performance.com Forums{{#if:G-E| — original post by G-E}}{{#if:2013-12-19 07:35:16|, posted 2013-12-19 07:35:16}}{{#if:2| · 2 post{{#ifeq:2|1||s}}}}{{#if:/Z31performance_archive/forum/z31-performance-upgrade-forums/engine-management/23085-radium-fstr-returnless-swirl-tank-on-rb-opinions.html|
Local archive: view archived thread on dev.z31library.com}}

G-E: (2013-12-19 07:35:16)

http://www.radiumauto.com/FST-R-Fuel…-FPR-P348.aspx

Scenario: my racecar has no battery tray, so that's the perfect spot, rb intake is on that side, no danger with heat, as are the fuel lines to the gas tank…

My thought centers around using a standard aftermarket rb25 topfeed fuel rail (not like raw brokerage's rail with a port for return in the middle), and have the two ends routed back to a Y-block with a fuel pressure gauge into the swirl tank

Discuss?

Spooledup300z: (2013-12-19 09:48:04)

Although a very cool idea, seems a little overkill. Raw brokerage fuel rail is based on the greedy. I would stick to a standard aftermarket fuel pump and reg an lines etc. Spend the time on a fuel cell.. Maybe more worth your while in the end.

Retrieved from "https://dev.z31library.com/index.php?title=Forums/Z31P/z31-performance-upgrade-forums_engine-management/Radium_FSTR_returnless_swirl_tank_on_RB_opinions%3F&oldid=4946"