Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Forums
z31performance archive
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Z31 Library
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Forums/Z31P/z31-performance-upgrade-forums suspension-chassis-and-brakes/rear toe excessive
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{ForumImport |op_user=mcx |op_date=2015-09-18 16:45:06 |post_count=5 |archive_url=/Z31performance_archive/forum/z31-performance-upgrade-forums/suspension-chassis-and-brakes/25325-rear-toe-excessive.html }} '''mcx:''' <small>(2015-09-18 16:45:06)</small> i have been doing a string alignment and camber check today on a 1988 200sxSE ..car is set up on slide plates and the string lines set up perfect for front to rear track differance..its going decent except for the rear toe....the best i can get adusting the rear eccentric bolts is about 4mm toe-in on the passenger side and 2.82mm toe-in on rear drivers side....rear camber is fine with 1.10 degree pass and .80 degree driver side....everything has been upgraded to poly, the only parts reused were the eccentric bolts , which seemed ok…do they wear out?? anything else i should double check? btw, the front was easy to dial in perfect. thx ,mike ---- '''G-E:''' <small>(2015-09-19 01:40:24)</small> Have you used the eccentric to influence camber at all? You lose about have the toe range if you do… That said, have you looked into my trailing arm conversions? That will allow _all_ your alignment options no matter how high or low you go ---- '''mcx:''' <small>(2015-09-19 11:59:18)</small> thanks for the reply…my car is on stock springs[130000 miles] and seems to be sitting at correct factory height all around??[26" ground to top of wheel fender arch]…car has been upgraded to 1995 240sxSE 16" rims from stock 15"…215-55-16 in the rear......adjusting the toe eccentrics bolt, will only go from 8mm toe-in to 4mm toe-in....you can definitely see it shift the control arm fine, but it gets to the high part of the eccentric cam slope and wont allow anymore shift.....i'll set it up again and see if the rear camber is being mistakenly adjusted and screwing with the toe-in range....thanks. yup…i look at that conversion kit every time i log in here LOL. ---- '''mcx:''' <small>(2015-10-22 20:20:57)</small> follow up…shimmed the rear springs which raised the rear to 28"..rechecked my floor leveling technique so it was perfect…and sure enough everything is now in spec…front camber is o* rear camber is 0*/driver and 0.65*/passenger.....rear toe is now -.23mm/driver and- .18mm/passenger ---- '''adamvann3:''' <small>(2015-10-23 17:08:21)</small> Just to follow-up, as rear spring seats begin to deteriorate, the OEM setup begins to sag causing mis alignment. When I upgraded to eibach springs with new poly spring seats, the rear hub to fender measurement remained the same with worn OEM suspension.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Z31 Library may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Z31 Library:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Template used on this page:
Template:ForumImport
(
edit
)